Actress Jamie Lee Curtis is upset with editors of over-50s magazine AARP for turning a cover shot of her wearing a strapless dress into a nude controversy. The Freaky Friday star admits she was shocked when the harmless photo was cropped to make it look as if she was topless on the cover of the new issue of the publication – because she was actually just baring her shoulders. Appearing on The Oprah Winfrey Show on Monday, Curtis revealed all about the scandal, confessing she's upset to think people actually believe she'd pose topless for a magazine. Holding up a copy of the publication, she fumed, "Isn't it fascinating that this constitutes being naked. What the 'f' are we talking about? In my world, this is called strapless. And yet they had to sell this magazine; I didn't go around saying I was topless." The actress insists she'd never go topless, and regrets the times she has bared her breasts in the past. She adds, "I have a 21-year-old daughter in college and a 12-year-old son; if I could take back Trading Places today I would because I didn't know I was gonna have a child… when I was 21 and I exposed my breasts in a movie."

Why are you only upset about your Duke & Dukes in Trading Places, Jamie Lee? It doesn't rattle your dentures to know that you were also naked in Love Letters, Grandview, U.S.A., Perfect, Blue Steel, and The Tailor of Panama? Oh, we get it. You're not upset about those because no one saw them. It's only embarrassing to be naked in a movie that airs on TBS every Saturday afternoon, not one you can find on video in the 99¢ bin at Wal-Mart.


If you enjoy embarrassing old ladies, then take a gander at Jamie Lee's cur-tits at MrSkin.com.