You might think that writing CelebNewsWire is all rainbows and sunshine, hobnobbing with luminaries like Ted Knight and Pia Zadora, pink champagne toasts and freebie gift bags and invites to nightclubs in Dubuque. And you'd be right, of course, but there's also a sinister side to the glamour. And that's the moral dilemma that comes up when we're faced with posting pictures of an internationally beloved star famed for her philanthropy in a state of undress, pregnant yammos visible and obviously taken by some creepo paparazzo with a serious zoom lens.
When such a situation comes up, we usually hem and haw and weigh the pros and cons and then say screw it and post the pics because we have a weak moral fiber and because we don't want Lily Allen's cooch to be the only Sexy Lady Story of the day. After the cut, Angelina Jolie boobies!
![]()
Way better quality pics of Angelina Jolie in the buff at MrSkin.com.
2 Comments
I THINK ALL YOU NEWS PHOTOGS AND STORY WRITERS SHUD LEARN TO KEEP YOUR NOSES IN YOUR OWN BUSINESS OR AT LEAST BE DISCRETE AND SELECTIVE OF WHAT YOU PUT OUT. YOU ARE ALL SICK IF THAT'S THE WAY YOU GET YOUR JOLLIES, BY RUINING OTHERS LIVES WITH YOUR BULL ''CRAP''. GLAD I DON'T HAVE TO BE IN A POSITION TO HAVE THE LIKES OF YOU ALL IN MY LIFE
Pregnant tits are just tits if you ask me. Maybe you shouldn't be naked outside if you don't want pictures online. Ya think?